在线咨询 切换到宽版
eetop公众号 创芯大讲堂 创芯人才网

 找回密码
 注册

手机号码,快捷登录

手机号码,快捷登录

搜帖子
楼主: cleo115

[资料] INNOVUS vs ICC2

[复制链接]
发表于 2019-6-19 18:47:17 | 显示全部楼层
thanks for info.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2021-4-26 12:09:47 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 ozcozcozc 于 2021-5-26 17:04 编辑

I have to say that almost all articles in deepchip.com are with bias and prejudice.

you will always finding an "objective" comparison test in deepchip headline, and the result will always be that cadence beats synopsys ass badly, including their STA and synthesis tool. but we all know PT and design compiler has a dominant position in the field.

Let's say a real example in my company, my colleague ran a block of 6M instance with the same floorplan in both Innovus and ICC2, INNOVUS cannot  even proceed to the post-route stage, hang there for very long time. and finally did PnR by ICC2.

It's 2021 now, not 2015, ICC2 updated so many versions, no mention of fusion compiler is promising. Let's wait and see.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2022-11-21 01:16:41 | 显示全部楼层
As per practical knowledge, for a 3M+ design , we had seen better QOR for innovus  
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2023-5-19 18:40:24 | 显示全部楼层
thanks
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2025-6-28 19:14:30 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢分享
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐 上一条 /1 下一条

手机版| 小黑屋| 关于我们| 联系我们| 隐私声明| EETOP 创芯网
( 京ICP备:10050787号 京公网安备:11010502037710 )

GMT+8, 2025-7-21 07:02 , Processed in 0.119726 second(s), 3 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

eetop公众号 创芯大讲堂 创芯人才网
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表